Urban LoRa networks promise to provide a cost-efficient and scalable communication backbone for smart cities. One core challenge in rolling out and operating these networks is radio network planning, i.e., precise predictions about possible new locations and their impact on network coverage. Path loss models aid in this task, but evaluating and comparing different models requires a sufficiently large set of high-quality received packet power samples. In this paper, we report on a corresponding large-scale measurement study covering an urban area of 200km2 over a period of 230 days using sensors deployed on garbage trucks, resulting in more than 112 thousand high-quality samples for received packet power. Using this data, we compare eleven previously proposed path loss models and additionally provide new coefficients for the Log-distance model. Our results reveal that the Log-distance model and other well-known empirical models such as Okumura or Winner+ provide reasonable estimations in an urban environment, and terrain based models such as ITM or ITWOM have no advantages. In addition, we derive estimations for the needed sample size in similar measurement campaigns. To stimulate further research in this direction, we make all our data publicly available.
翻译:城市LoRa网络承诺为智能城市提供具有成本效益和可扩展的通信主干网。推出和运行这些网络的一个核心挑战是无线电网络规划,即对可能的新地点及其对网络覆盖面的影响作出准确预测。路径损失模型有助于这项任务。路径损失模型协助这项工作,但评估和比较不同的模型需要足够大的一系列高质量的收到的包装电力样本。在本文件中,我们报告在230天内利用垃圾卡车上安装的传感器进行相应的大型测量研究,覆盖城市面积200平方公里,在230天内进行测量研究,结果产生了超过112,000个接收包能的高质量样本。我们比较了11个先前提出的路径损失模型,并为测距模型提供了新的系数。我们的结果显示,测距模型和其他著名的实验模型,如Okumura或Winner+,提供了城市环境中的合理估计,以及ITM或ITWOM等基于地形的模型没有优势。此外,我们还在类似的测量运动中得出了所需的样本规模的估计。为了进一步推动这方面的研究,我们公布所有数据。