Multiobjective optimization problems with heterogeneous objectives are defined as those that possess significantly different types of objective function components (not just incommensurable in units or scale). For example, in a heterogeneous problem the objective function components may differ in formal computational complexity, practical evaluation effort (time, costs, or resources), determinism (stochastic vs deterministic), or some combination of all three. A particularly challenging variety of heterogeneity may occur by the combination of a time-consuming laboratory-based objective with other objectives that are evaluated using faster computer-based calculations. Perhaps more commonly, all objectives may be evaluated computationally, but some may require a lengthy simulation process while others are computed from a relatively simple closed-form calculation. In this chapter, we motivate the need for more work on the topic of heterogeneous objectives (with reference to real-world examples), expand on a basic taxonomy of heterogeneity types, and review the state of the art in tackling these problems. We give special attention to heterogeneity in evaluation time (latency) as this requires sophisticated approaches. We also present original experimental work on estimating the amount of heterogeneity in evaluation time expected in many-objective problems, given reasonable assumptions, and survey related research threads that could contribute to this area in future.
翻译:具有不同目标的多目标优化问题被定义为那些具有明显不同种类的客观功能组成部分(不仅在单位或规模上不可比较)的问题。例如,在一个复杂多样的问题中,客观功能组成部分在正式的计算复杂程度、实际的评价努力(时间、成本或资源)、确定性(随机和确定性)或所有三个方面的某些组合方面可能有所不同。由于将一个耗时的实验室目标与使用更快的计算机计算方法加以评价的其他目标结合起来,可能会出现特别具有挑战性的多样性。也许更为常见的是,所有目标都可以进行计算,但有些目标可能需要一个漫长的模拟过程,而另一些则需要从相对简单的封闭式计算中计算。在本章中,我们提出需要就多种不同目标的主题开展更多的工作(参照现实世界的实例)、扩大多种类型的基本分类,并审查处理这些问题的科技状况。我们特别注意评价时间的异性(延迟),因为需要这一复杂的方法。我们还介绍了最初的实验性工作,即估算各种目标性假设的数量,从而在预期的时间内有助于进行这一可靠的研究。