This paper is concerned with upstreamness and downstreamness of industries and countries in global value chains. Upstreamness and downstreamness measure respectively the average distance of an industrial sector from final consumption and from primary inputs, and they are computed from based on the most used global Input-Output tables databases, e.g., the World Input-Output Database (WIOD). Recently, Antr\`as and Chor reported a puzzling and counter-intuitive finding in data from the period 1995-2011, namely that (at country level) upstreamness appears to be positively correlated with downstreamness, with a correlation slope close to $+1$. This effect is stable over time and across countries, and it has been confirmed and validated by later analyses. We analyze a simple model of random Input/Output tables, and we show that, under minimal and realistic structural assumptions, there is a positive correlation between upstreamness and downstreamness of the same industrial sector, with correlation slope equal to $+1$. This effect is robust against changes in the randomness of the entries of the I/O table and different aggregation protocols. Our results suggest that the empirically observed puzzling correlation may rather be a necessary consequence of the few structural constraints (positive entries, and sub-stochasticity) that Input/Output tables and their surrogates must meet.
翻译:本文关注工业和各国在全球价值链中的上游和下游。上游和下游分别衡量工业部门与最终消费和初级投入的平均距离。上游和下游分别衡量工业部门与最终消费和初级投入的平均距离。它们是根据最使用的全球投入-产出表数据库,例如世界投入-产出数据库(WIOD)计算的。最近,Antr<unk> as和Chor报告说,在1995-2011年期间的数据中,上游和下游之间存在着一种令人费解和反直观的结论,即(国家一级的)上游似乎与下游密切相关,其相关斜坡接近1美元。这一影响在时间和国家之间是稳定的,并经后来的分析确认和验证。我们分析了随机输入/产出表的简单模型,我们表明,在最低和现实的结构假设下游之间,同一工业部门的上游和下游之间有着一种积极的关联,其相关斜坡等于1美元。这种效应对于I/O表格和不同综合协议条目的随机性变化十分有力。我们发现,从经验上观察到的结构-投入/驱动力的细微的进度必然符合其结构/下层限制的结果。</s>