We analyse predictions of future recruitment to a multi-centre clinical trial based on a maximum-likelihood fitting of a commonly used hierarchical Poisson-Gamma model for recruitments at individual centres. We consider the asymptotic accuracy of quantile predictions in the limit as the number of recruitment centres grows large and find that, in an important sense, the accuracy of the quantiles does not improve as the number of centres increases. When predicting the number of further recruits in an additional time period, the accuracy degrades as the ratio of the additional time to the census time increases, whereas when predicting the amount of additional time to recruit a further $n^+_\bullet$ patients, the accuracy degrades as the ratio of $n^+_\bullet$ to the number recruited up to the census period increases. Our analysis suggests an improved quantile predictor. Simulation studies verify that the predicted pattern holds for typical recruitment scenarios in clinical trials and verify the much improved coverage properties of prediction intervals obtained from our quantile predictor. In the process of extending the applicability of our methodology, we show that in terms of the accuracy of all integer moments it is always better to approximate the sum of independent gamma random variables by a single gamma random variable matched on the first two moments than by the moment-matched Gaussian available from the central limit theorem.
翻译:我们根据对各中心征聘工作普遍使用的Poisson-Gamma等级模式的最大可能性,分析今后向多中心临床试验征聘工作的预测;我们考虑到随着征聘中心数目的大量增加,在限额内对四分位预测的无症状准确性,发现在重要意义上,四分位数的准确性不会随着中心数目的增加而提高;在预测额外征聘人数时,准确性会随着与人口普查时间增加的比率而降低,而在预测额外时间与普查时间的比率增加时,预测额外征聘更多时间的金额时,则随着在普查期间征聘人数的增加,对四分位数预测的无症状准确性会降低。我们的分析表明,在重要意义上,量化预测的准确性不会随着中心数目的增加而提高。在预测临床试验中的典型征聘假设性假设性假设性,并核实从我们的定量预测性预测性预测性预测性预测性间隔的覆盖范围大为改进。在扩大我们方法适用性的过程中,我们从所有最短的时间预测性数字的准确性看,从所有最短时间到普查性数字的概率的第一次的精确性点,总是比唯一最短时刻点点点点的可测。