In practice, optimization models are often prone to unavoidable inaccuracies due to lack of data and dubious assumptions. Traditionally, this placed special emphasis on risk-based and robust formulations, and their focus on "conservative" decisions. We develop, in contrast, an "optimistic" framework based on Rockafellian relaxations in which optimization is conducted not only over the original decision space but also jointly with a choice of model perturbation. The framework enables us to address challenging problems with ambiguous probability distributions from the areas of two-stage stochastic optimization without relatively complete recourse, probability functions lacking continuity properties, expectation constraints, and outlier analysis. We are also able to circumvent the fundamental difficulty in stochastic optimization that convergence of distributions fails to guarantee convergence of expectations. The framework centers on the novel concepts of exact and asymptotically exact Rockafellians, with interpretations of "negative" regularization emerging in certain settings. We illustrate the role of Phi-divergence, examine rates of convergence under changing distributions, and explore extensions to first-order optimality conditions. The main development is free of assumptions about convexity, smoothness, and even continuity of objective functions.
翻译:在实践上,优化模型往往容易由于缺乏数据和可疑的假设而不可避免地出现不准确的情况。传统上,这特别强调基于风险和稳健的配方,并注重“保守”决定。相比之下,我们制定了基于罗卡菲利安放松的“乐观”框架,其中优化不仅针对原始决策空间,而且与模型扰动的选择相结合。该框架使我们能够解决来自两阶段随机优化领域概率分布不明的挑战性问题,而没有相对完整的追索权、概率功能缺乏连续性特性、期望限制和外部分析。我们还能够绕过在随机优化方面存在的基本困难,即分配的趋同无法保证期望的趋同。框架的核心概念是精确和不时精确的罗卡菲利安人,并对某些环境中出现的“消极”规范进行解释。我们展示了Phi-digence的作用,审视了在改变分配过程中的趋同率,并探索了向第一级最佳条件的延伸。主要发展是顺利的假设、关于连续性和平稳的假设。