High-quality online civic infrastructure is increasingly critical for the success of democratic processes. There is a pervasive reliance on search engines to find facts and information necessary for political participation and oversight. We find that approximately 10\% of the top Google search results are likely to mislead California information seekers who use search to identify their congressional representatives. 70\% of the misleading results appear in featured snippets above the organic search results. We use both qualitative and quantitative methods to understand what aspects of the information ecosystem lead to this sociotechnical breakdown. Factors identified include Google's heavy reliance on Wikipedia, the lack of authoritative, machine parsable, high accuracy data about the identity of elected officials based on geographic location, and the search engine's treatment of under-specified queries. We recommend steps that Google can take to meet its stated commitment to providing high quality civic information, and steps that information providers can take to improve the legibility and quality of information about congressional representatives available to search algorithms.
翻译:高质量的在线公民基础设施对于民主进程的成功越来越重要。人们普遍依赖搜索引擎来寻找政治参与和监督所必需的事实和信息。我们发现,谷歌搜索结果中约有10个顶尖的谷歌搜索结果有可能误导使用搜索来识别其国会代表的加利福尼亚信息搜索者。70个误导结果出现在有机搜索结果之上的特写片段中。我们使用定性和定量方法来了解信息生态系统的哪些方面导致了这种社会技术的崩溃。所查明的因素包括谷歌严重依赖维基百科,缺乏基于地理位置的关于当选官员身份的权威、机器可辨别、高精确度的数据,以及搜索引擎对未充分指定查询的查询的处理。我们建议谷歌能够采取哪些步骤来兑现其公开承诺,即提供高质量的公民信息,以及信息提供者可以采取哪些步骤来提高关于可用于搜索算法的国会代表的信息的清晰度和质量。