After stating the measurement problem, physicists usually assume the problem to be coming from the measurement part. Since classical probabilities also collapse when updating information, there is nothing special about quantum state collapse. I believe the problem comes from the unitary evolution part of quantum theory. The question we should be asking is not 'what happens during measurement?' but 'what is time?'. After discussing the problems with time evolution in quantum theory, we propose a new approach to interpret time and argue how it would emerge from the non-commutativity of quantum theory, assuming participatory realism. Its relation to the familiar mechanical or unitary notion of time is discussed. The subjectivity associated with the increasingly popular epistemic interpretations of quantum theory makes it look like it's a cure that's worse than the disease. We attempt to get objectivity back into quantum physics without resorting to the many worlds or other such interpretations.
翻译:描述测量问题后, 物理学家通常会认为问题来自测量部分。 由于古典概率在更新信息时也会崩溃, 量子国家崩溃并没有什么特殊之处。 我认为问题来自量子理论的单一进化部分。 我们应该问的问题不是“ 测量期间会发生什么? ” 而是“ 时间是什么? ” 。 在讨论量子理论的时间演变问题之后, 我们提出一种新的方法来解释时间, 并争论它如何从量子理论的非对等性中产生, 假设是参与性的现实主义。 讨论它与熟悉的机械或单一的时间概念的关系。 与量子理论日益流行的认知性解释相关的主观性使得它看起来是一种比疾病更糟糕的治疗方法。 我们试图在不诉诸许多世界或其他此类解释的情况下, 将客观性重新回到量子物理学中。