Financial speculators often seek to increase their potential gains with leverage. Debt is a popular form of leverage, and with over 39.88B USD of total value locked (TVL), the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending markets are thriving. Debts, however, entail the risks of liquidation, the process of selling the debt collateral at a discount to liquidators. Nevertheless, few quantitative insights are known about the existing liquidation mechanisms. In this paper, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study the breadth of the borrowing and lending markets of the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem. We focus on Aave, Compound, MakerDAO, and dYdX, which collectively represent over 85% of the lending market on Ethereum. Given extensive liquidation data measurements and insights, we systematize the prevalent liquidation mechanisms and are the first to provide a methodology to compare them objectively. We find that the existing liquidation designs well incentivize liquidators but sell excessive amounts of discounted collateral at the borrowers' expenses. We measure various risks that liquidation participants are exposed to and quantify the instabilities of existing lending protocols. Moreover, we propose an optimal strategy that allows liquidators to increase their liquidation profit, which may aggravate the loss of borrowers.
翻译:金融投机者往往试图通过杠杆增加潜在收益。 债务是一种流行的杠杆形式,其总价值超过39.88B美元锁定(TVL ), 分散金融(DeFi) 贷款市场蓬勃发展。 但是,债务带来清算风险,即将债务抵押品折价出售给清算者的过程。然而,对现有清算机制的量化了解甚少。在本文中,我们最先研究Etheum DeFi生态系统的借贷市场范围。我们关注的是Aave、Compl、MakerDAO和dYX,它们集体占Etheurum贷款市场的85%以上。鉴于广泛的清算数据测量和洞察力,我们把普遍的清算机制系统化,并首先提供客观比较它们的方法。我们发现,现有的清算设计很好地激励了清算者,但在借款人支出时却出售了过多的贴现抵押品。我们衡量了清算参与者所面临的各种风险,并量化了现有贷款协议的不稳定性。此外,我们提出了一种最佳战略,允许流动性增加其亏损。