There is a widespread assumption that the peak velocities of visually guided saccades in the dark are up to 10~\% slower than those made in the light. Studies that questioned the impact of the surrounding brightness conditions, come to differing conclusions, whether they have an influence or not and if so, in which manner. The problem is of a complex nature as the illumination condition itself may not contribute to different measured peak velocities solely but in combination with the estimation of the pupil size due to its deformation during saccades or different gaze positions. Even the measurement technique of video-based eye tracking itself could play a significant role. To investigate this issue, we constructed a stepper motor driven artificial eye with fixed pupil size to mimic human saccades with predetermined peak velocity \& amplitudes under three different brightness conditions with the EyeLink 1000, one of the most common used eye trackers. The aim was to control the pupil and brightness. With our device, an overall good accuracy and precision of the EyeLink 1000 could be confirmed. Furthermore, we could find that there is no artifact for pupil based eye tracking in relation to changing brightness conditions, neither for the pupil size nor for the peak velocities. What we found, was a systematic, small, yet significant change of the measured pupil sizes as a function of different gaze directions.
翻译:人们普遍认为,黑暗中视觉引导高中的峰值速度比光线显示的速度慢10个百分点。质疑周围亮度条件影响的研究得出不同的结论,这些研究是否具有影响,如果有影响,以何种方式得出不同的结论。问题是一个复杂的性质,因为照明条件本身可能不会仅仅促成不同的测量峰值速度,而是结合对学生体积的估计,因为它在高中或不同视力位置期间的变形。甚至视频跟踪眼睛的测量技术本身也可以发挥重要作用。为了调查这一问题,我们建造了一个具有固定学生尺寸的继子发动机驱动的人工眼睛,在三种不同的亮度条件下模拟人类十字路口,其速度是预定的峰值 ⁇ 振振振,这是最常用的目测器之一。目的是控制学生和光亮度。由于我们的设备,EyeLink 1000 整体的准确性和精确性可以被确认。此外,我们发现,在以学生体积为基础的眼睛跟踪中,没有以固定学生体积为主的手工艺来模拟学生的眼部,在改变方向的峰值方面,我们所测到的峰值大小。