Deep learning's success has been attributed to the training of large, overparameterized models on massive amounts of data. As this trend continues, model training has become prohibitively costly, requiring access to powerful computing systems to train state-of-the-art networks. A large body of research has been devoted to addressing the cost per iteration of training through various model compression techniques like pruning and quantization. Less effort has been spent targeting the number of iterations. Previous work, such as forget scores and GraNd/EL2N scores, address this problem by identifying important samples within a full dataset and pruning the remaining samples, thereby reducing the iterations per epoch. Though these methods decrease the training time, they use expensive static scoring algorithms prior to training. When accounting for the scoring mechanism, the total run time is often increased. In this work, we address this shortcoming with dynamic data pruning algorithms. Surprisingly, we find that uniform random dynamic pruning can outperform the prior work at aggressive pruning rates. We attribute this to the existence of "sometimes" samples -- points that are important to the learned decision boundary only some of the training time. To better exploit the subtlety of sometimes samples, we propose two algorithms, based on reinforcement learning techniques, to dynamically prune samples and achieve even higher accuracy than the random dynamic method. We test all our methods against a full-dataset baseline and the prior work on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, and we can reduce the training time by up to 2x without significant performance loss. Our results suggest that data pruning should be understood as a dynamic process that is closely tied to a model's training trajectory, instead of a static step based solely on the dataset alone.
翻译:深层学习的成功归功于在大量数据上对大型、 过度量化模型的培训。 随着这一趋势的继续, 模型培训成本已经高得令人望而却步, 需要使用强大的计算系统来培训最先进的网络。 大量研究致力于通过各种模型压缩技术( 如修剪和四分化)解决培训的迭代成本。 较少花精力针对迭代数。 以往的工作, 如忘记分数和格拉恩德/ EL2N 得分, 通过在完整数据集中识别重要样本来解决这个问题, 并清理剩余样本, 从而降低每个世纪的迭代。 尽管这些方法减少了培训时间, 但它们使用昂贵的固定评分算算法, 在计算评分机制时, 总运行时间往往会增加。 在这项工作中, 我们用动态数据调算法来解决这一短路过短的问题。 令人惊讶的是, 我们发现, 统一的随机调整过程可以超越先前的工作, 以侵略性计速率的速度来解决这个问题。 我们将此归因于“ 时间 ” 精确的测算方法, 有时以精确的测算方法来, 我们的测算方法比 精确的测算方法更精确的测算方法 。