In many applications free surface flow through rigid porous media has to be modeled. Examples refer to coastal engineering applications as well as geotechnical or biomedical applications. Albeit the frequent applications, slight inconsistencies in the formulation of the governing equations can be found in the literature. The main goal of this paper is to identify these differences and provide a quantitative assessment of different approaches. Following a review of the different formulations, simulation results obtained from three alternative formulations are compared with experimental and numerical data. Results obtained by 2D and 3D test cases indicate that the predictive differences returned by the different formulations remain small for most applications, in particular for small porous Reynolds number ReP < 5000. Thus it seems justified to select a formulation that supports an efficient algorithm and coding structure.
翻译:在许多应用中,必须模拟通过僵硬多孔介质自由地表流的多种应用,例如沿海工程应用以及地质技术或生物医学应用。尽管经常应用,但在文献中可以发现治理方程的拟订方面略有不一致。本文件的主要目的是查明这些差异,并对不同方法进行定量评估。在审查不同的配方之后,将三种替代配方的模拟结果与实验和数字数据进行比较。2D和3D试验案例的结果表明,在大多数应用中,不同配方的预测差异仍然很小,特别是小号雷诺兹(ReP) < 5000。因此,选择一种支持高效算法和编码结构的配方似乎是合理的。