Social media has been a paramount arena for election campaigns for political actors. While many studies have been paying attention to the political campaigns related to partisanship, politicians also can conduct different campaigns according to their chances of winning. Leading candidates, for example, do not behave the same as fringe candidates in their elections, and vice versa. We, however, know little about this difference in social media political campaign strategies according to their odds in elections. We tackle this problem by analyzing candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. Our study finds that, as their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with, from people in general to the electrical districts and specific persons (verified accounts or accounts with many followers). Our study brings new insights into the candidates' campaign strategies through the analysis based on the novel perspective of the candidate's electoral situation.
翻译:社会媒体一直是政治行动者竞选活动的首要舞台。 虽然许多研究一直关注与党派有关的政治运动,但政治家也可以根据其胜选机会开展不同的竞选活动。例如,主要候选人在选举中的行为与边缘候选人不同,反之亦然。然而,我们对于社交媒体政治竞选战略的这种差异知之甚少。我们通过从使用者、议题和答复情绪的角度分析候选人的推文来解决这个问题。我们的研究发现,随着候选人胜选机会的增加,他们所交流的目标从一般人到电区和特定人(经核实的账户或许多追随者账户)。我们的研究通过对候选人选举情况的新观点进行分析,对候选人竞选战略产生新的洞察力。