We design a recursive measure of voting power based on partial as well as full voting efficacy. Classical measures, by contrast, incorporate solely full efficacy. We motivate our design by representing voting games using a division lattice and via the notion of random walks in stochastic processes, and show the viability of our recursive measure by proving it satisfies a plethora of postulates that any reasonable voting measure should satisfy. These include the iso-invariance, dummy, dominance, donation, minimum-power bloc, and quarrel postulates.
翻译:我们设计了一种基于部分和充分投票效率的递归性投票权衡量标准。 相比之下,经典措施则完全包含全部效力。 我们通过使用分数拉特和随机行走的概念来代表投票游戏,并通过在随机过程中进行随机行走的概念来激励我们的设计,并通过证明它满足了大量合理投票措施应该满足的假设来显示我们循环措施的可行性。 这些假设包括偏差、假的、支配性的、捐赠的、最小权力集团和争吵的假设。