This application paper presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation of the suitability of Topological Data Analysis (TDA) for the quantitative comparison of turbulent flows. Specifically, our study documents the usage of the persistence diagram of the maxima of flow enstrophy (an established vorticity indicator), for the topological representation of 180 ensemble members, generated by a coarse sampling of the parameter space of five numerical solvers. We document five main hypotheses reported by domain experts, describing their expectations regarding the variability of the flows generated by the distinct solver configurations. We contribute three evaluation protocols to assess the validation of the above hypotheses by two comparison measures: (i) a standard distance used in scientific imaging (the L2 norm) and (ii) an established topological distance between persistence diagrams (the L2-Wasserstein metric). Extensive experiments on the input ensemble demonstrate the superiority of the topological distance (ii) to report as close to each other flows which are expected to be similar by domain experts, due to the configuration of their vortices. Overall, the insights reported by our study bring an experimental evidence of the suitability of TDA for representing and comparing turbulent flows, thereby providing to the fluid dynamics community confidence for its usage in future work. Also, our flow data and evaluation protocols provide to the TDA community an application-approved benchmark for the evaluation and design of further topological distances.
翻译:本应用文件对地形数据分析(TDA)是否适合对动荡流进行定量比较进行了全面的实验性评估。具体地说,我们的研究记录了对180个混合成员进行地形学代表性的180个混合成员(通过对5个数值解算器的参数空间进行粗略抽样而产生的),对地形数据分析(TDA)是否适合对动荡流进行定量比较进行了全面的实验性评估。我们记录了域专家报告的5个主要假设,说明了他们对不同求解器配置产生的流动的可变性的预期。我们贡献了3个评价协议,通过两个比较措施评估上述假设的验证情况:(一) 科学成像(L2标准)所使用的标准距离和(二) 持久性图(L2-Wasserstein标准)之间既定的地形学距离。 对投入群集进行了广泛的实验,显示了表层距离的优越性(二) 将报告与预计由域专家相似的每一种流动情况相近。我们的研究所报道的3个评估方案,通过两种比较措施评估:(一) 科学成像(L2标准) 和(二) 科学成像中所使用的标准距离标准(一种标准的距离) 和(L2-WasssservidA) 的距离) 将进一步提供社区设计数据流的精确性评估。