With advancements in distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts, tokenized voting rights gained prominence within Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Voting rights tokens (aka. governance tokens) are fungible tokens that grant individual holders the right to vote upon the fate of a project. The motivation behind these tokens is to achieve decentral control. Because the initial allocations of these tokens is often un-democratic, the DeFi project Yearn Finance experimented with a fair launch allocation where no tokens are pre-mined and all participants have an equal opportunity to receive them. Regardless, research on voting rights tokens highlights the formation of oligarchies over time. The hypothesis is that the tokens' tradability is the cause of concentration. To examine this proposition, this paper uses an Agent-based Model to simulate and analyze the concentration of voting rights tokens post fair launch under different trading modalities. It serves to examine three distinct token allocation scenarios considered as fair. The results show that regardless of the allocation, concentration persistently occurs. It confirms the hypothesis that the disease is endogenous: the cause of concentration is the tokens tradablility. The findings inform theoretical understandings and practical implications for on-chain governance mediated by tokens.
翻译:随着分布式分类账技术和智能合同的进步,象征性的投票权在分散式金融(DeFi)中占据了显著地位。表决权标牌(aka. 治理标牌)是可互换的象征,赋予个人持有者对项目命运的投票权。这些标牌背后的动机是实现分散控制。由于这些标牌的最初分配往往不民主,DeFi项目年度融资实验了公平的发射分配,其中没有预发的标牌,所有参与者都有同等的接收机会。尽管如此,关于投票权标牌的研究突显了寡头随时间演变的形成。假设是,这些标牌的可变性是集中的原因。为了审查这一假设,本文使用一个基于代理的模型来模拟和分析以不同贸易方式进行的投票权标牌公平启动后的集中情况。它有助于审查认为公平的三种截然不同的象征性分配设想。结果表明,不管分配方式如何分配,集中持续发生。它证实了一种假设,即该疾病是内生的:集中性的原因是象征性的不透明性。研究结果通过媒介管理来说明理论理解和对链式管理的实际影响。