We consider the obnoxious facility location problem (in which agents prefer the facility location to be far from them) and propose a hierarchy of distance-based proportional fairness concepts for the problem. These fairness axioms ensure that groups of agents at the same location are guaranteed to be a distance from the facility proportional to their group size. We consider deterministic and randomized mechanisms, and compute tight bounds on the price of proportional fairness. In the deterministic setting, not only are our proportional fairness axioms incompatible with strategyproofness, the Nash equilibria may not guarantee welfare within a constant factor of the optimal welfare. On the other hand, in the randomized setting, we identify proportionally fair and strategyproof mechanisms that give an expected welfare within a constant factor of the optimal welfare.
翻译:我们考虑了令人讨厌的设施地点问题(其中代理商更喜欢设施地点远离他们),并提出了这一问题的远程比例公平概念等级。 这些公平原则确保同一地点的代理商群体与设施距离与其群体规模相称。 我们考虑了确定性和随机化的机制,并计算了比例公平价格的严格界限。 在确定性环境下,不仅我们的比例公平原则与战略防守不相容,纳什平衡可能无法在最佳福利的不变因素中保障福利。 另一方面,在随机化的环境下,我们找到了在最佳福利的不变因素中提供预期福利的适度公平且战略防范性的机制。