Intent modifies an actor's culpability of many types wrongdoing. Autonomous Algorithmic Agents have the capability of causing harm, and whilst their current lack of legal personhood precludes them from committing crimes, it is useful for a number of parties to understand under what type of intentional mode an algorithm might transgress. From the perspective of the creator or owner they would like ensure that their algorithms never intend to cause harm by doing things that would otherwise be labelled criminal if committed by a legal person. Prosecutors might have an interest in understanding whether the actions of an algorithm were internally intended according to a transparent definition of the concept. The presence or absence of intention in the algorithmic agent might inform the court as to the complicity of its owner. This article introduces definitions for direct, oblique (or indirect) and ulterior intent which can be used to test for intent in an algorithmic actor.
翻译:自主算法代理人有能力造成伤害,虽然他们目前缺乏法人资格,从而阻止他们犯罪,但一些当事方了解一种算法在何种故意模式下可能违反规则是有用的,从创造者或所有者的观点来看,他们希望确保其算法从未打算通过从事如果由法人实施本来会被称为犯罪的行为而造成伤害。检察官可能有兴趣了解一种算法的行为是否根据对概念的透明定义而内部意图。算法代理人的存在或缺乏意图可能告知法院其所有者的同谋关系。这一条提出了直接、否定(或间接)和间接意图的定义,可用于检验算法行为者的意图。