We study a market of investments on networks, where each agent (vertex) can invest in any enterprise linked to her, and at the same time, raise capital for her firm's enterprise from other agents she is linked to. Failing to raise sufficient capital results with the firm defaulting, being unable to invest in others. Our main objective is to examine the role of collateral contracts in handling the strategic risk that can propagate to a systemic risk throughout the network in a cascade of defaults. We take a mechanism-design approach and solve for the optimal scheme of collateral contracts that capital raisers offer their investors. These contracts aim at sustaining the efficient level of investment as a unique Nash equilibrium, while minimizing the total collateral. Our main results contrast the network environment with its non-network counterpart (where the sets of investors and capital raisers are disjoint). We show that for acyclic investment networks, the network environment does not necessitate any additional collaterals, and systemic risk can be fully handled by optimal bilateral collateral contracts between capital raisers and their investors. This is, unfortunately, not the case for cyclic investment networks. We show that bilateral contracting will not suffice to resolve systemic risk, and the market will need an external entity to design a global collateral scheme for all capital raisers. Furthermore, the minimum total collateral that will sustain the efficient level of investment as a unique equilibrium may be arbitrarily higher, even in simple cyclic investment networks, compared with its corresponding non-network environment. Additionally, we prove computational-complexity results, both for a single enterprise and for networks.
翻译:我们研究的是网络投资市场,每个代理商(顶点)都可以在与其有联系的任何企业中投资,同时从与之有联系的其他代理商中为其公司企业筹集资本。未能通过公司违约提高足够的资本结果,无法投资于其他代理商。我们的主要目标是审查担保合同在处理战略风险方面的作用,这种风险在网络中可能随一系列违约而蔓延到系统风险。我们采取机制设计办法,解决资本筹集商向其投资者提供的担保性合同的可靠性最佳计划。这些合同的目的是保持投资效率水平,将其作为独特的纳什平衡,同时尽量减少全部抵押品。我们的主要结果将网络环境与其非网络对应方(投资者和资本筹集商的组合相互脱节)形成对比。我们表明,对于环环球投资网络而言,网络环境不需要额外的担保,而系统风险完全由资本筹集商与其投资者之间的最佳双边担保性合同来应对。不幸的是,对于周期投资网络来说,即使这样的情况也是如此。我们表明,双边合同合同合同合同的高效率水平将不足以解决整个纳什平衡,同时尽量减少整个抵押品网络的风险。我们表明,相对于整个系统性投资的固定性机制来说,一个独特的实体需要一种最起码的风险。