This note presents a proof of the conjecture in \citet*{pearl1995testability} about testing the validity of an instrumental variable in hidden variable models. It implies that instrument validity cannot be tested in the case where the endogenous treatment is continuously distributed. This stands in contrast to the classical testability results for instrument validity when the treatment is discrete. However, imposing weak structural assumptions on the model, such as continuity between the observable variables, can re-establish theoretical testability in the continuous setting.
翻译:本说明展示了在\citet ⁇ pearl1995可测试性} 中测试隐藏变量模型中工具变量有效性的推测。 这意味着在本地处理持续分布的情况下,无法测试工具有效性。 这与治疗不连续时典型的仪器有效性测试结果形成对照。 但是,对模型施加薄弱的结构假设,如可观测变量之间的连续性,可以在连续环境中重新确立理论测试能力。