As increasingly powerful generative AI systems are developed, the release method greatly varies. We propose a framework to assess six levels of access to generative AI systems: fully closed; gradual or staged access; hosted access; cloud-based or API access; downloadable access; and fully open. Each level, from fully closed to fully open, can be viewed as an option along a gradient. We outline key considerations across this gradient: release methods come with tradeoffs, especially around the tension between concentrating power and mitigating risks. Diverse and multidisciplinary perspectives are needed to examine and mitigate risk in generative AI systems from conception to deployment. We show trends in generative system release over time, noting closedness among large companies for powerful systems and openness among organizations founded on principles of openness. We also enumerate safety controls and guardrails for generative systems and necessary investments to improve future releases.
翻译:随着日益强大的基因突变系统的发展,释放方法大相径庭。我们提议了一个框架来评估获得基因突变系统的6个层次:完全封闭;逐步或分阶段进入;主机进入;云基或API进入;可下载进入;和完全开放。从完全封闭到完全开放,每个层次都可以被视为沿梯度的一个选择。我们概述了整个梯度的主要考虑:释放方法会带来取舍,特别是围绕集中力和减轻风险之间的紧张关系。从概念到部署,需要从多样化和多学科的角度来审查和减轻基因突变的人工突变系统的风险。我们显示了基因突变系统逐渐释放的趋势,我们注意到大公司对基于开放原则的强大系统和各组织开放的封闭性。我们还列举了基因突变系统的安全控制和防护装置,以及改进未来释放工作的必要投资。