In a future connected vehicle environment, an optimized route and motion planning should not only fulfill efficiency and safety constraints but also minimize vehicle motions and oscillations, causing poor ride comfort perceived by passengers. This work provides a framework for a large-scale and cost-efficient evaluation to address AV's ride comfort and allow the comparison of different comfort assessment strategies. The proposed tool also gives insights to comfort data, allowing for the development of novel algorithms, guidelines, or motion planning systems incorporating passenger comfort. A vehicle-road simulation framework utilizable to assess the most common ride comfort determination strategies based on vehicle dynamics data is presented. The developed methodology encompasses a road surface model, a non-linear vehicle model optimization, and Monte Carlo simulations to allow for an accurate and cost-efficient generation of virtual chassis acceleration data. Ride comfort is determined by applying a commonly used threshold method and an analysis based on ISO 2631. The two methods are compared against comfort classifications based on empirical measurements of the International Roughness Index (IRI). A case study with three road sites in Austria demonstrates the framework's practical application with real data and achieves high-resolution ride comfort classifications. The results highlight that ISO 2631 comfort estimates are most similar to IRI classifications and that the thresholding procedure detects preventable situations but also over- or underestimates ride comfort. Hence, the work shows the potential risk of negative ride comfort of AVs using simple threshold values and stresses the importance of a robust comfort evaluation method for enhancing AVs' path and motion planning with maximal ride comfort.
翻译:在与汽车相关的未来车辆环境中,优化的路线和运动规划不仅应达到效率和安全限制,而且应尽量减少车辆运动和振动,造成乘客对驾驶不便感到的舒适感;这项工作为大规模和具有成本效益的评价提供了一个框架,以解决AV的骑车舒适度问题,并对不同的舒适度评估战略进行比较;拟议工具还使人们对舒适度数据有洞察力,从而可以制定包含乘客舒适度的新奇算法、准则或运动规划系统;提出了车辆-公路模拟框架,用以根据车辆动态数据评估最常用的骑车舒适度确定战略;开发的方法包括道路表面模型、非线性车辆模型优化和蒙特卡洛模拟,以便准确和高成本效益地生成虚拟机床加速数据;通过采用通用的门槛法和基于ISO 2631的分析来确定舒适度;将两种方法与基于对国际舒适度指数(IRI)进行的经验性测量的舒适度分类进行比较;与奥地利三个道路站进行的一项案例研究显示框架的实际应用,并用最清晰的舒适度、最可靠的运动性车辆模型进行优化,同时用最清晰的舒适度估算;国际标准化组织在A级和最可靠的航程中也显示对A类的舒适度评估。