Ensuring transparency and integrity in political communication on climate change has arguably never been more important than today. Yet we know little about how politicians focus on, talk about, and portray climate change on social media. Here we study it from the perspective of political advertisement. We use Meta's Ad Library to collect 602,546 ads that have been issued by US Congress members since mid-2018. Out of those only 19,176 (3.2%) are climate-related. Analyzing this data, we find that Democrats focus substantially more on climate change than Republicans, with 99.7% of all climate-related ads stemming from Democratic politicians. In particular, we find this is driven by a small core of Democratic politicians, where 72% of all impressions can be attributed to 10 politicians. Interestingly, we find a significant difference in the average amount of impressions generated per dollar spent between the two parties. Republicans generate on average 188% more impressions with their climate ads for the same money spent as Democrats. We build models to explain the differences and find that demographic factors only partially explain the variance. Our results demonstrate differences of climate-related advertisements of US congress members and reveal differences in advertising characteristics between the two political parties. We anticipate our work to be a starting point for further studies about climate-related ads on Meta's platforms.
翻译:确保政治传播中有关气候变化的透明度和诚信从未像今天这样重要。然而,我们对政治家在社交媒体上关注、讨论和描绘气候变化的方式了解甚少。在这里,我们从政治广告的角度进行研究。我们使用Meta的广告库收集了自2018年中期以来由美国国会议员发布的602,546个广告。其中,仅有19,176个(3.2%)与气候有关。通过分析这些数据,我们发现民主党人比共和党人更关注气候变化,其中99.7%的所有与气候有关的广告都来自民主党政治家。特别是,我们发现这是由少数核心的民主党政治家推动的,其中72%的所有印象可以归因于10个政治家。有趣的是,我们发现两党之间的气候广告花费相同,但共和党人的广告平均产生的曝光量比民主党人多188%。我们建立模型来解释这些差异,并发现人口统计学因素仅部分解释了差异。我们的研究结果揭示了美国国会议员与气候相关广告之间的差异,并揭示了两个政党在广告特征方面的差异。我们预计我们的工作将成为关于Meta平台上与气候有关的广告的进一步研究的起点。