We developed and validated a rating scale to assess the aesthetic pleasure (or beauty) of a visual data representation: the BeauVis scale. With our work we offer researchers and practitioners a simple instrument to compare the visual appearance of different visualizations, unrelated to data or context of use. Our rating scale can, for example, be used to accompany results from controlled experiments or be used as informative data points during in-depth qualitative studies. Given the lack of an aesthetic pleasure scale dedicated to visualizations, researchers have mostly chosen their own terms to study or compare the aesthetic pleasure of visualizations. Yet, many terms are possible and currently no clear guidance on their effectiveness regarding the judgment of aesthetic pleasure exists. To solve this problem, we engaged in a multi-step research process to develop the first validated rating scale specifically for judging the aesthetic pleasure of a visualization (osf.io/fxs76). Our final BeauVis scale consists of five items, "enjoyable," "likable," "pleasing," "nice," and "appealing." Beyond this scale itself, we contribute (a) a systematic review of the terms used in past research to capture aesthetics, (b) an investigation with visualization experts who suggested terms to use for judging the aesthetic pleasure of a visualization, and (c) a confirmatory survey in which we used our terms to study the aesthetic pleasure of a set of 3 visualizations.
翻译:我们开发并验证了一个评级尺度,以评估视觉数据显示的审美快感(或美观)的审美快感(或美观 ) : Beau Vis 尺度。 我们的工作为研究人员和从业人员提供了一个简单的工具,以比较与数据或使用环境无关的不同视觉化的视觉外观。 例如,我们的评级尺度可以用来随附受控实验的结果,或在深入的定性研究中用作信息性数据点。由于缺少专门用于视觉化的审美快感尺度,研究人员大多选择了自己的术语来研究或比较视觉化的审美快感。然而,许多术语是可能的,目前也没有明确的指南来指导他们判断审美观快乐的有效性。为了解决这一问题,我们开展了一个多阶段的研究进程,以制定第一个经验证的评级尺度,具体用于判断视觉化的审美感(osf.io/fxs76),我们最后的美观规模由五个项目组成,即“可喜性”、“可喜性”、“喜”、“精采”和“审美观性”。除了这一尺度本身,我们的贡献是(a)系统化专家对在视觉研究中使用的视觉勘测中所使用的术语进行了评估。