While previously a nascent theoretical construct, decentralized autonomous organizations have grown rapidly in recent years. DAOs typically emerge around the management of decentralized financial applications and thus benefit from the rapid growth of innovation in this sector. In response, global regulators increasingly voice the intent to regulate these activities. This may impose an excessive compliance burden on DAOs, unless they are deemed sufficiently decentralized to be regulated. Yet, decentralization is an abstract concept with scarce legal precedence. We investigate dimensions of decentralization through thematic analysis, combining extant literature with a series of expert interviews. We propose a definition of 'sufficient decentralization' and present a general framework for the assessment of decentralization. We derive five dimensions for the assessment of decentralization in DAOs: Token-weighted voting, Infrastructure, Governance, Escalation and Reputation. We present a discretionary sample application of the framework and five propositions on the future regulation and supervision of DAOs. We contribute new practical insights on the topic of compliance and decentralized organizations to the growing discourse on the application of blockchain technology in information systems and management disciplines
翻译:近年来,自治组织的发展迅猛,成为区块链领域的关键发展方向之一。然而,当局部门开始采取监管行动时,这些组织就成为了监管的重点。因此,自治组织如果没有足够的分权性质,就可能面临繁琐的合规负担。本文通过批判性分析和专家访谈相结合的方法,构建了一个评估自治组织分权程度的框架,并提出了一个“足够分权”的定义。该评估框架包括了代币加权投票、基础设施、治理、升级和声誉等五个维度。我们提出了对未来自治组织的监管的五个命题:1.我国可能更倾向于转向监管DAO代币,2.DAO设计可以支持多样化的治理框架,3.DAO的扩容使得去中心化程度会变得更加复杂,4. DAO的去中心化评估需要更多的研究,5. 監管應分門別類。本文为开发和实施区块链技术的管理实践提供了新的见解,是一个有价值的研究贡献。