Some scientific research questions ask to guide decisions and others do not. By their nature frequentist hypothesis-tests yield a dichotomous test decision as result, rendering them rather inappropriate for latter types of research questions. Bayes factors, however, are argued to be both able to refrain from making decisions and to be employed in guiding decisions. This paper elaborates on how to use a Bayes factor for guiding a decision. In this regard, its embedding within the framework of Bayesian decision theory is delineated, in which a (hypothesis-based) loss function needs to be specified. Typically, such a specification is difficult for an applied scientist as relevant information might be scarce, vague, partial, and ambiguous. To tackle this issue, a robust, interval-valued specification of this loss function shall be allowed, such that the essential but partial information can be included into the analysis as is. Further, the restriction of the prior distributions to be proper distributions (which is necessary to calculate Bayes factors) can be alleviated if a decision is of interest. Both the resulting framework of hypothesis-based Bayesian decision theory with robust loss function and how to derive optimal decisions from already existing Bayes factors are depicted by user-friendly and straightforward step-by-step guides.
翻译:一些科学研究问题要求指导决定,而另一些则没有。根据其性质的性质,经常的假设试验得出了分解的测试决定,结果使得它们对于后几类研究问题不适宜。不过,据论证,贝叶因素既能够避免作出决定,又可用于指导决定。本文件阐述了如何使用拜叶因素指导决定。在这方面,它被纳入贝叶西亚决定理论的框架,其中需要说明(基于假说)损失的功能。通常,对于应用科学家来说,这种规格很难,因为有关信息可能稀少、模糊、部分和模糊。为了解决这一问题,应当允许对这项损失功能作出严格、有期估的规格,以便将基本但部分的信息纳入目前的分析。此外,如果决定有意义,则可以减轻对先前分配进行适当分配的限制(这是计算贝伊斯系数所必要的)。由此产生的基于假说(基于假说)损失的理论框架,具有稳健的损失功能,而且模糊不清。为了解决这一问题,应当允许对这项损失功能作出稳健的、有期估的规格,这样就可以将基本但部分的信息纳入现有的分析。此外,如果决定需要加以适当分配,则可以减轻限制(这是计算),如果作出决定的话。由此而得出的基于假设的贝叶决定的理论框架是稳妥易取的指南。