The study of biases, such as gender or racial biases, is an important topic in the social and behavioural sciences. However, the literature does not always clearly define the concept. Definitions of bias are often ambiguous or not provided at all. To study biases in a precise manner, it is important to have a well-defined concept of bias. We propose to define bias as a direct causal effect that is unjustified. We propose to define the closely related concept of disparity as a direct or indirect causal effect that includes a bias. Our proposed definitions can be used to study biases and disparities in a more rigorous and systematic way. We compare our definitions of bias and disparity with various criteria of fairness introduced in the artificial intelligence literature. We also illustrate our definitions in two case studies, focusing on gender bias in science and racial bias in police shootings. Our proposed definitions aim to contribute to a better appreciation of the causal intricacies of studies of biases and disparities. We hope that this will also promote an improved understanding of the policy implications of such studies.
翻译:对偏见的研究,如性别或种族偏见,是社会和行为科学中的一个重要专题。然而,文献并不总能明确地界定这个概念。偏见的定义往往含糊不清,或根本没有提供。为了精确地研究偏见的定义,重要的是要有一个明确界定的偏见概念。我们提议将偏见界定为一种不合理的直接因果关系。我们提议将密切相关的差别概念界定为一种直接或间接的因果关系,其中包括偏见。我们提议的定义可以用来更严格和系统地研究偏见和差别。我们把偏见和差别的定义与人工情报文献中引入的各种公平标准进行比较。我们还在两个案例研究中说明我们的定义,重点是科学中的性别偏见和警察枪击中的种族偏见。我们提议的定义旨在帮助更好地理解偏见和差别研究的因果关系。我们希望这也将有助于更好地了解这种研究的政策影响。