In this thesis a comprehensive verification framework is proposed to contend with some important issues in composability verification and a verification process is suggested to verify composability of different kinds of systems models, such as reactive, real-time and probabilistic systems. With an assumption that all these systems are concurrent in nature in which different composed components interact with each other simultaneously, the requirements for the extensive techniques for the structural and behavioral analysis becomes increasingly challenging. The proposed verification framework provides methods, techniques and tool support for verifying composability at its different levels. These levels are defined as foundations of consistent model composability. Each level is discussed in detail and an approach is presented to verify composability at that level. In particular we focus on the Dynamic-Semantic Composability level due to its significance in the overall composability correctness and also due to the level of difficulty it poses in the process. In order to verify composability at this level we investigate the application of three different approaches namely (i) Petri Nets based Algebraic Analysis (ii) Colored Petri Nets (CPN) based State-space Analysis and (iii) Communicating Sequential Processes based Model Checking. All three approaches attack the problem of verifying dynamic-semantic composability in different ways however they all share the same aim i.e., to confirm the correctness of a composed model with respect to its requirement specifications.
翻译:在本理论中,提议一个全面的核查框架,以对付在可比较性核查方面的一些重要问题,并建议一个核查进程,以核查不同系统模型的可比较性,例如反应、实时和概率系统;假设所有这些系统具有同时性,不同组成组成部分同时相互作用的性质,因此,对结构和行为分析的广泛技术的要求越来越具有挑战性;提议的核查框架为核查不同层次的可比较性提供了方法、技术和工具支持。这些级别被界定为一致的可比较性模型的基础。每个级别都进行了详细讨论,并提出了一个方法,以核查该级别的可比较性。特别是,我们侧重于动态-可比较性层次,因为它在整个可比较性中具有重要性,而且由于它在这个过程中造成的困难程度。为了核实这一层次的可比较性,我们调查了三种不同方法的应用情况,即(一) 以高血压网为基础的模型(二) 以国家空间网络为基础的可比较性网络(CPN) 和(三) 以可比较性为基准的可比较性分析方法,并核查以所有具有不同目的的可比较性的方法。