Helpful reviews have been essential for the success of e-commerce services, as they help customers make quick purchase decisions and benefit the merchants in their sales. While many reviews are informative, others provide little value and may contain spam, excessive appraisal, or unexpected biases. With the large volume of reviews and their uneven quality, the problem of detecting helpful reviews has drawn much attention lately. Existing methods for identifying helpful reviews primarily focus on review text and ignore the two key factors of (1) who post the reviews and (2) when the reviews are posted. Moreover, the helpfulness votes suffer from scarcity for less popular products and recently submitted (a.k.a., cold-start) reviews. To address these challenges, we introduce a dataset and develop a model that integrates the reviewer's expertise, derived from the past review history of the reviewers, and the temporal dynamics of the reviews to automatically assess review helpfulness. We conduct experiments on our dataset to demonstrate the effectiveness of incorporating these factors and report improved results compared to several well-established baselines.
翻译:对电子商务服务的成功来说,有益的审查至关重要,因为这些审查有助于客户作出快速采购决定,并有利于商人的销售。虽然许多审查信息丰富,但其他审查提供的价值很小,可能包含垃圾邮件、过多的评估或意外的偏差。由于审查数量大,质量参差不齐,发现有益的审查的问题最近引起许多注意。现有的确定有益的审查的方法主要侧重于审查文本,忽略了以下两个关键因素:(1)谁在审查后发布审查,(2)在公布审查时公布。此外,对不太受欢迎的产品和最近提交的审查(a.k.a.、冷却启动)的帮助票是缺乏的。为了应对这些挑战,我们引入了一个数据集,并开发了一种模式,将审查者的专门知识从审查者过去的审查历史中得出,以及审查的时间动态结合起来,以便自动评估是否有帮助。我们在我们的数据集上进行试验,以表明纳入这些因素的效果,并报告与若干既定基线相比,结果有所改善。</s>