In online sales, sellers usually offer each potential buyer a posted price in a take-it-or-leave fashion. Buyers can sometimes see posted prices faced by other buyers, and changing the price frequently could be considered unfair. The literature on posted price mechanisms and prophet inequality problems has studied the two extremes of pricing policies, the fixed price policy and fully dynamic pricing. The former is suboptimal in revenue but is perceived as fairer than the latter. This work examines the middle situation, where there are at most $k$ distinct prices over the selling horizon. Using the framework of prophet inequalities with independent and identically distributed random variables, we propose a new prophet inequality for strategies that use at most $k$ thresholds. We present asymptotic results in $k$ and results for small values of $k$. For $k=2$ prices, we show an improvement of at least $11\%$ over the best fixed-price solution. Moreover, $k=5$ prices suffice to guarantee almost $99\%$ of the approximation factor obtained by a fully dynamic policy that uses an arbitrary number of prices. From a technical standpoint, we use an infinite-dimensional linear program in our analysis; this formulation could be of independent interest to other online selection problems.
翻译:在网上销售中,卖主通常向每个潜在买主提供一种以接受或放弃方式支付的价格。买主有时会看到其他买主面对的上市价格,而改变价格经常被认为是不公平的。关于上市价格机制和先知不平等问题的文献研究了定价政策的两个极端,即固定价格政策和完全动态的定价。前者在收入上不尽如人意,但被认为比后者更公平。这项工作考察了中间情况,即销售地平线上存在最高为K美元的不同价格。利用具有独立和相同分布随机变量的先知不平等框架,我们提出了使用最多以美元阈值为单位的战略的新先知不平等。我们提出了以美元计价和小价值为K美元的结果。对于美元=2美元的价格,我们显示比最佳固定价格解决方案至少提高了11美元。此外,美元=5美元的价格足以保证通过完全动态的政策获得的近似值几乎99美元。从技术角度出发,我们使用一个无限的线性方案来进行独立分析,我们使用一个不限值的在线选择,这是我们的另一个问题。