Searching for medical information is both a common and important activity since it influences decisions people make about their healthcare. Using search engine optimization (SEO), content producers seek to increase the visibility of their content. SEO is more likely to be practiced by commercially motivated content producers such as pharmaceutical companies than by non-commercial providers such as governmental bodies. In this study, we ask whether content quality correlates with the presence or absence of SEO measures on a web page. We conducted a user study in which N = 61 participants comprising laypeople as well as experts in health information assessment evaluated health-related web pages classified as either optimized or non-optimized. The subjects rated the expertise of non-optimized web pages as higher than the expertise of optimized pages, justifying their appraisal by the more competent and reputable appearance of non-optimized pages. In addition, comments about the website operators of the non-optimized pages were exclusively positive, while optimized pages tended to receive positive as well as negative assessments. We found no differences between the ratings of laypeople and experts. Since non-optimized, but high-quality content may be outranked by optimized content of lower quality, trusted sources should be prioritized in rankings.
翻译:使用搜索引擎优化(SEO),内容制作人试图提高内容的可见度。SEO更有可能被制药公司等出于商业动机的内容制作人所采用,而不是政府机构等非商业提供者所采用。在这项研究中,我们询问内容质量是否与网页上存在或没有SEO措施有关。我们进行了用户研究,其中N=61名参与者,包括普通人和卫生信息评估专家,对健康信息评估网页进行了评估,将健康相关网页分为优化或非优化。对象将非优化网页的专门知识评为高于优化网页的专业知识,证明他们得到非优化网页更合格和有信誉的外观的评价是合理的。此外,关于非优化网页操作者的评论完全是正面的,而优化网页往往得到正面的和负面的评估。我们发现,非优化网页和专家的评级之间没有差异。由于非优化网页的功能化,但高品质的网页的精通程度可能高于优化的网页,因此,应当通过高品质的排序,通过低质量的可靠来源,将最高质量的内容排在最高级别上。