Purpose: To utilize high-resolution quantitative CT (QCT) imaging features for prediction of diagnosis and prognosis in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Approach: 40 ILD patients (20 usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), 20 non-UIP pattern ILD) were classified by expert consensus of 2 radiologists and followed for 7 years. Clinical variables were recorded. Following segmentation of the lung field, a total of 26 texture features were extracted using a lattice-based approach (TM model). The TM model was compared with previously histogram-based model (HM) for their abilities to classify UIP vs non-UIP. For prognostic assessment, survival analysis was performed comparing the expert diagnostic labels versus TM metrics. Results: In the classification analysis, the TM model outperformed the HM method with AUC of 0.70. While survival curves of UIP vs non-UIP expert labels in Cox regression analysis were not statistically different, TM QCT features allowed statistically significant partition of the cohort. Conclusions: TM model outperformed HM model in distinguishing UIP from non-UIP patterns. Most importantly, TM allows for partitioning of the cohort into distinct survival groups, whereas expert UIP vs non-UIP labeling does not. QCT TM models may improve diagnosis of ILD and offer more accurate prognostication, better guiding patient management.
翻译:利用高分辨率定量CT(QCT)成像特征来预测肺间疾病纤维化的诊断和预测。方法:40名ILD病人(20个常见间肺炎(UIP),20个非UIP型ILD)经2名放射科专家协商一致分类,并跟踪了7年。临床变量记录了肺部分解后,使用基于衣状的病情分析法(TM模型)共提取了26个纹理特征。将TM 模型与先前基于直方图的模型(HM)进行比较,以了解其将UIP与非UIP分类的能力。在预测性评估中,进行了生存分析,比较了专家诊断性标签与TM 指标。结果:在分类分析中,TM 模型比HM方法高出0.70。在 Cox 病情回归分析中,UIP与非UIP专家标签的存活曲线曲线并不不同,TM UCT特性模型允许以具有统计意义的比值的模型进行更好的分类。结论:M IM 模型比UIP更明显地改进了IP的模型,而没有分析。