Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning?

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) -- the problem of learning reward functions from demonstrations of an \emph{expert policy} -- plays a critical role in developing intelligent systems, such as those that understand and imitate human behavior. While widely used in applications, theoretical understandings of IRL admit unique challenges and remain less developed compared with standard RL theory. For example, it remains open how to do IRL efficiently in standard \emph{offline} settings with pre-collected data, where states are obtained from a \emph{behavior policy} (which could be the expert policy itself), and actions are sampled from the expert policy. This paper provides the first line of results for efficient IRL in vanilla offline and online settings using polynomial samples and runtime. We first design a new IRL algorithm for the offline setting, Reward Learning with Pessimism (RLP), and show that it achieves polynomial sample complexity in terms of the size of the MDP, a concentrability coefficient between the behavior policy and the expert policy, and the desired accuracy. Building on RLP, we further design an algorithm Reward Learning with Exploration (RLE), which operates in a natural online setting where the learner can both actively explore the environment and query the expert policy, and obtain a stronger notion of IRL guarantee from polynomial samples. We establish sample complexity lower bounds for both settings showing that RLP and RLE are nearly optimal. Finally, as an application, we show that the learned reward functions can \emph{transfer} to another target MDP with suitable guarantees when the target MDP satisfies certain similarity assumptions with the original (source) MDP.