In requiring that a statement of broader impact accompany all submissions for this year's conference, the NeurIPS program chairs made ethics part of the stake in groundbreaking AI research. While there is precedent from other fields and increasing awareness within the NeurIPS community, this paper seeks to answer the question of how individual researchers reacted to the new requirement, including not just their views, but also their experience in drafting and their reflections after paper acceptances. We present survey results and considerations to inform the next iteration of the broader impact requirement should it remain a requirement for future NeurIPS conferences.
翻译:NeurIPS方案主席在要求为今年会议提交的所有提交材料必须同时说明更广泛的影响时,将道德作为开创性AI研究的利害关系的一部分,虽然其他领域有先例,NeurIPS社区内部也提高了认识,但本文件试图回答一个问题,即研究人员个人如何对新要求作出反应,不仅包括他们的意见,也包括他们在文件接受后起草和思考方面的经验。我们提出调查结果和考虑,以便在今后的NeurIPS会议中继续要求对更广泛的影响要求进行反复说明。