Our understanding of intelligence is directed primarily at the human level. This paper attempts to give a more unifying definition that can be applied to the natural world in general. The definition would be used more to verify a degree of intelligence, not to quantify it and might help when making judgements on the matter. While correct behaviour is the preferred definition, a metric that is grounded in Kolmogorov's Complexity Theory is suggested, which leads to a measurement about entropy. A version of an accepted AI test is then put forward as the 'acid test' and might be what a free-thinking program would try to achieve. Recent work by the author has been more from a direction of mechanical processes, or ones that might operate automatically. This paper will not try to question the idea of intelligence, in the sense of a pro-active or conscious event, but try to put it into a more passive, automatic and mechanical context. The paper also suggests looking at intelligence and consciousness as being slightly different.
翻译:本文试图给出一个更统一的定义,可以适用于整个自然世界。 定义将更多地用于核实一定程度的情报,而不是量化,在对问题做出判断时可能有所帮助。 虽然正确的行为是首选的定义,但建议采用基于科尔莫戈罗夫复杂理论的衡量标准,从而得出对昆虫的测量结果。 接受的人工智能测试版本随后作为“ 酸测试” 提出, 可能是自由思考方案所要达到的目标。 作者最近的工作更多地来自机械过程的方向, 或可能自动运作的进程。 本文将不试图从主动或有意识事件的角度质疑情报概念,而是试图将其置于一个更被动、自动和机械的背景中。 文件还表明对情报和意识的审视略有不同。