Ad hoc teamwork (AHT) is the challenge of designing a learner that effectively collaborates with unknown teammates without prior coordination mechanisms. Early approaches address the AHT challenge by training the learner with a diverse set of handcrafted teammate policies, usually designed based on an expert's domain knowledge about the policies the learner may encounter. However, implementing teammate policies for training based on domain knowledge is not always feasible. In such cases, recent approaches attempted to improve the robustness of the learner by training it with teammate policies generated by optimising information-theoretic diversity metrics. However, optimising information-theoretic diversity metrics may generate teammates with superficially different behaviours, which does not necessarily result in a robust learner that can effectively collaborate with unknown teammates. In this paper, we present an automated teammate policy generation method optimising the Best-Response Diversity (BRDiv) metric, which measures diversity based on the compatibility of teammate policies in terms of returns. We evaluate our approach in environments with multiple valid coordination strategies, comparing against methods optimising information-theoretic diversity metrics and an ablation not optimising any diversity metric. Our experiments indicate that optimising BRDiv yields a diverse set of training teammate policies that improve the learner's performance relative to previous teammate generation approaches when collaborating with near-optimal previously unseen teammate policies.
翻译:早期方法通过对学习者进行各种手工艺团队政策的培训来应对AHT的挑战,这种培训通常以专家对学习者可能遇到的政策的领域知识为基础,通常以专家对学习者可能遇到的政策的实地知识为基础设计。然而,实施基于领域知识的培训的团队政策并非始终可行。在这种情况下,最近的方法试图通过对学习者进行培训,使其与优化信息理论多样性衡量标准所产生的团队政策相结合,提高学习者的稳健性。然而,优化信息理论多样性衡量标准可能以表面上不同的行为产生团队伙伴,这并不一定导致一个强有力的学习者能够有效地与未知的团队伙伴合作。在本文件中,我们介绍了一个基于最佳应对多样性(BRDiviv)衡量标准,该标准衡量在回报方面基于团队政策兼容性的多样性。我们用多种有效的协调战略来评估我们在环境中的做法,与对信息理论多样性政策进行优化的方法进行比较,这并不一定导致能够与未知的团队团队有效协作政策进行协作。我们以往的模型和测试团队的模型显示,我们不改进多样性的团队的模型。