The citation impact of a scientific publication is usually seen as a one-dimensional concept. We introduce a multi-dimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of a publication. In addition to the level of citation impact, quantified by the number of citations received by a publication, we also conceptualize and operationalize the depth and breadth and the dependence and independence of the citation impact of a publication. The proposed framework distinguishes between publications that have a deep citation impact, typically in a relatively narrow research area, and publications that have a broad citation impact, probably covering a wider area of research. It also makes a distinction between publications that are strongly dependent on earlier work and publications that make a more independent scientific contribution. We use our multi-dimensional citation impact framework to report basic descriptive statistics on the citation impact of highly cited publications in all scientific disciplines. In addition, we present a detailed case study focusing on the field of scientometrics. The proposed citation impact framework provides a more in-depth understanding of the citation impact of a publication than a traditional one-dimensional perspective.
翻译:科学出版物的引文影响通常被视为一个单维概念。我们采用一种多维框架来说明出版物的引文影响。除了以出版物收到的引文数量量化的引文影响程度外,我们还将出版物的深度和广度以及引文影响的依赖性和独立性概念化和付诸实施。拟议框架区分了具有深刻引文影响的出版物(通常在相对狭窄的研究领域)和具有广泛引文影响的出版物(可能涵盖更广泛的研究领域),还区分了高度依赖早期工作的出版物和具有更独立科学贡献的出版物。我们利用我们的多维引文影响框架报告关于所有科学学科中高引文影响的基本描述性统计数据。此外,我们介绍了侧重于科学计量领域的详细案例研究。拟议的引文影响框架比传统的一维观点更深入地了解出版物的引文影响。