Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are increasingly used to measure blood glucose levels and provide information about the treatment and management of diabetes. Our motivating study contains CGM data during sleep for 174 study participants with type II diabetes mellitus measured at a 5-minute frequency for an average of 10 nights. We aim to quantify the effects of diabetes medications and sleep apnea severity on glucose levels. Statistically, this is an inference question about the association between scalar covariates and functional responses. However, many characteristics of the data make analyses difficult, including (1) non-stationary within-day patterns; (2) substantial between-day heterogeneity, non-Gaussianity, and outliers; 3) large dimensionality due to the number of study participants, sleep periods, and time points. We evaluate and compare two methods: fast univariate inference (FUI) and functional additive mixed models (FAMM). We introduce a new approach for calculating p-values for testing a global null effect of covariates using FUI, and provide practical guidelines for speeding up FAMM computations, making it feasible for our data. While FUI and FAMM are philosophically different, they lead to similar point estimators in our study. In contrast to FAMM, FUI is fast, accounts for within-day correlations, and enables the construction of joint confidence intervals. Our analyses reveal that: (1) biguanide medication and sleep apnea severity significantly affect glucose trajectories during sleep, and (2) the estimated effects are time-invariant.
翻译:连续的葡萄糖监测器(CGMs)越来越多地用于测量血糖水平,并提供有关糖尿病治疗和管理的信息。我们的激励研究包含174名睡眠期学习参与者在睡眠期间的CGM数据,平均10晚以5分钟的频率测量二型糖尿病患者,平均10晚的频率为5分钟的频率;我们的目标是量化糖尿病药物和睡眠激素对葡萄糖水平的影响。从统计上看,这是一个关于卡路里混血体和功能性反应之间的关联的推论问题。然而,数据的许多特点使得分析变得困难,包括:(1) 非固定的日内模式;(2) 大量日间高血压、非甘油性和室外值;(3) 由于研究参与者的数量、睡眠期和时间点而有很大的多元性。我们评估和比较了两种方法:快速无盐酸性(FUI)和功能性添加性混合模型(FAMMM)。我们采用了一种新的方法来计算p值,用于测试使用FUII的全球共性反应的无效性效应,并且提供了大幅超时空性、非加热性反应的日内快速计算,我们FMMMMU的模型的精确度和直系数据。