Objectives: An SLR is presented focusing on text mining based automation of SLR creation. The present review identifies the objectives of the automation studies and the aspects of those steps that were automated. In so doing, the various ML techniques used, challenges, limitations and scope of further research are explained. Methods: Accessible published literature studies that primarily focus on automation of study selection, study quality assessment, data extraction and data synthesis portions of SLR. Twenty-nine studies were analyzed. Results: This review identifies the objectives of the automation studies, steps within the study selection, study quality assessment, data extraction and data synthesis portions that were automated, the various ML techniques used, challenges, limitations and scope of further research. Discussion: We describe uses of NLP/TM techniques to support increased automation of systematic literature reviews. This area has attracted increase attention in the last decade due to significant gaps in the applicability of TM to automate steps in the SLR process. There are significant gaps in the application of TM and related automation techniques in the areas of data extraction, monitoring, quality assessment and data synthesis. There is thus a need for continued progress in this area, and this is expected to ultimately significantly facilitate the construction of systematic literature reviews.
翻译:方法:主要侧重于研究选择自动化、研究质量评估、数据提取和数据合成部分的已出版文献研究报告;分析了29项研究;结果:本审查确定了自动化研究的目标、研究选择、质量评估、数据提取和数据合成部分内的步骤、自动化研究采用的各种ML技术、挑战、限制和进一步研究的范围。讨论:我们描述了使用NLP/TM技术支持系统文献审查的自动化程度。这一领域在过去十年中受到越来越多的关注,因为TM在应用SLR进程中的自动化步骤方面存在巨大差距。在数据提取、监测、质量评估和数据合成领域应用TM和相关自动化技术方面存在重大差距。因此,有必要在这一领域继续取得进展,预计这将极大地促进系统文献的构建。