Urban scaling analysis in generally performed based on cities. In this study, we have (empirically) explored a new prospect for urban scaling analysis based on relatively larger local administrative units, which are independently functional, within a country. For this purpose, we have studied the scaling laws across Indian districts for the various socio-economic indicators (SEIs) within four distinct urbanization classes, namely rural, semi-rural, semi-urban and urban districts, and presented the estimated values of the scaling factors for each classes for the years 2001 and 2011 along with their goodness-of-fit measured by the $R^2$ values. Our result shows that the scaling laws indeed exist even at the district level for all most of the SEIs considered, related to education, employment, housing, health, etc.; the $R^2$ values obtained for these SEIs are very high (often greater than 0.8 or 0.9) in both the the years. For a few SEIs, however, the validity of scaling law increases as we move from rural to urban class of districts. The linearity of the scaling index has been statistically tested and it has been found, at 95\% level of confidence, that not all the SEIs behave linearly; some of them are characterized by super-linear behaviour and some behave sub-linearly. Statistical hypothesis tests have also been performed to test the equality of two scaling factors corresponding to two distinct classes and two different years to understand the differences in scaling relationships among increasing urbanisation classes and their changes over time.
翻译:在这项研究中,我们(经常)探索了以相对较大的地方行政单位为基础进行城市规模分析的新前景,这些地方行政单位在一个国家内独立运作;为此,我们研究了印度各地区在四个不同的城市化类别,即农村、半农村、半城市和城市地区中的各种社会经济指标(SEIs)范围内的各种社会经济指标(SEIs)的衡量法;介绍了2001年和2011年每一类的衡量因数的估计值,以及按2美元值衡量的优异值。我们的结果显示,在地区一级,在所考虑的与教育、就业、住房、卫生等有关的大多数SEIS(SEIs)一级,法律的衡量法确实存在;多年来,这些SEIs获得的数值非常高(通常大于0.8或0.9美元),但是,少数SEI提供了2001年和2011年每一类的衡量系数增加值的正确性,而我们从农村到城市的等级则测量为2美元。 比例指数的线性差异已经经过统计测试,并且已经发现,在95至地区一级的所有SEI级之间,从两个等级到两个等级的等级的等级的等级,它们的行为都表现为不同。