Given the importance of accurate team rankings in American college football (CFB) -- due to heavy title and playoff implications -- strides have been made to improve evaluation metrics across statistical categories, going from basic averages (e.g. points scored per game) to metrics that adjust for a team's strength of schedule, but one aspect that hasn't been emphasized is the complementary nature of American football. Despite the same team's offensive and defensive units typically consisting of separate player sets, some aspects of your team's defensive (offensive) performance may affect the complementary side: turnovers forced by your defense could lead to easier scoring chances for your offense, while your offense's ability to control the clock may help your defense. For 2009-2019 CFB seasons, we incorporate natural splines with group penalty approaches to identify the most consistently influential features of complementary football in a data-driven way, conducting partially constrained optimization in order to additionally guarantee the full adjustment for strength of schedule and homefield factor. We touch on the issues arising due to reverse-causal nature of certain within-game dynamics, discussing several potential remedies. Lastly, game outcome prediction performances are compared across several ranking adjustment approaches for method validation purposes.
翻译:鉴于美国大学足球(CFB)中准确的球队排名的重要性 -- -- 由于职称繁重和淘汰的影响 -- -- 在改进统计类别中的评价指标方面取得了长足进展,从基本平均数(例如每场比赛得分)到调整一个球队时间表的强度的衡量标准,但一个尚未强调的方面是美国足球的补充性质。尽管同一球队的进攻和防御单位通常由不同的球员组成,但你的球队防御(进攻)表现的某些方面可能会影响互补方面:由你的辩护所迫使的更替可能会使你的罪行更容易得分,而你的罪行控制时钟的能力可能帮助你的防御。在2009-2019年CFB季节,我们采用自然样条线与集体惩罚办法,以确定以数据驱动方式进行互补足球最一贯有影响力的特点,进行部分限制优化,以进一步保证对时间表和主场因素的全面调整。我们谈谈由于某些游戏内动态的逆向外性质而产生的问题,讨论若干潜在的补救措施。最后,对游戏结果预测业绩的等级比数级。