Diversity and inclusion are necessary prerequisites for shaping technological innovation that benefits society as a whole. A common indicator of diversity consideration is the representation of different social groups among software engineering (SE) researchers, developers, and students. However, this does not necessarily entail that diversity is considered in the SE research itself. In our study, we examine how diversity is embedded in SE research, particularly research that involves participant studies. To this end, we have selected 79 research papers containing 105 participant studies spanning three years of ICSE technical tracks. Using a content analytical approach, we identified how SE researchers report the various diversity categories of their study participants and investigated: 1) the extent to which participants are described, 2) what diversity categories are commonly reported, and 3) the function diversity serves in the SE studies. We identified 12 different diversity categories reported in SE participant studies. Our results demonstrate that even though most SE studies report on the diversity of participants, SE research often emphasizes professional diversity data, such as occupation and work experience, over social diversity data, such as gender or location of the participants. Furthermore, our results show that participant diversity is seldom analyzed or reflected upon when SE researchers discuss their study results, outcome or limitations. To help researchers self-assess their study diversity awareness, we propose a diversity awareness model and guidelines that SE researchers can apply to their research. With this study, we hope to shed light on a new approach to tackling the diversity and inclusion crisis in the SE field.
翻译:多样性考虑的一个共同指标是,不同社会群体在软件工程(SE)研究人员、开发者和学生中的代表性;然而,这并不一定意味着在SE研究中考虑多样性。我们在研究中审查了多样性是如何纳入SE研究的,特别是涉及参与者研究的研究。为此目的,我们选择了79份研究论文,其中载有105个参与者研究报告,涵盖为期三年的ICSE技术轨道。我们采用内容分析方法,确定了SE研究人员如何报告其研究参与者的不同类别并进行调查:(1)参与者被描述的程度,(2)通常报告的多样性类别,(3)在SE研究中提供的职能多样性。我们确定了SE参与研究中报告的12个不同多样性类别。我们的研究结果表明,尽管大多数SE研究都报告了参与者的多样性,但SE研究往往强调专业多样性数据,例如职业和工作经验,超过社会多样性数据,例如参与者的性别或地点。此外,我们的研究结果表明,当SE研究人员讨论其研究成果的模型、结果或局限性时,参与者很少被分析或反映多样性。我们用SE研究来帮助研究人员自我认识他们的多样化研究。我们用SE研究来了解他们的多样化,我们用新的方法去了解他们的多样化研究。