While most treatment evaluations focus on binary interventions, a growing literature also considers continuously distributed treatments. We propose a Cram\'{e}r-von Mises-type test for testing whether the mean potential outcome given a specific treatment has a weakly monotonic relationship with the treatment dose under a weak unconfoundedness assumption. In a nonseparable structural model, applying our method amounts to testing monotonicity of the average structural function in the continuous treatment of interest. To flexibly control for a possibly high-dimensional set of covariates in our testing approach, we propose a double debiased machine learning estimator that accounts for covariates in a data-driven way. We show that the proposed test controls asymptotic size and is consistent against any fixed alternative. These theoretical findings are supported by the Monte-Carlo simulations. As an empirical illustration, we apply our test to the Job Corps study and reject a weakly negative relationship between the treatment (hours in academic and vocational training) and labor market performance among relatively low treatment values.
翻译:虽然大多数治疗评价都侧重于二元干预,但越来越多的文献也考虑到持续分布的治疗方法。我们建议用Cram\'{e}r-von Mises 测试特定治疗的平均潜在结果是否与治疗剂量存在微弱的单体关系,且假设缺乏依据。在一个不可分离的结构模型中,应用我们的方法等于测试持续处理利益中平均结构功能的单一性。为了灵活控制测试方法中可能高维的共变体,我们建议用数据驱动的方式计算共变的双偏差机器学习估计仪。我们表明,拟议的测试控制是象征性的,与任何固定的替代方法是一致的。这些理论结论得到蒙特-卡洛模拟的支持。作为经验性说明,我们用我们的方法测试工兵团的研究,并拒绝治疗(学习和职业培训的小时)与劳动力市场表现在相对低的治疗价值中存在微的负面关系。