Drones (also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, UAVs) is a potential source of evidence in a digital investigation, partly due to their increasing popularity in our society. However, existing UAV/drone forensics generally rely on conventional digital forensic investigation guidelines such as those of ACPO and NIST, which may not be entirely fit_for_purpose. In this paper, we identify the challenges associated with UAV/drone forensics. We then explore and evaluate existing forensic guidelines, in terms of their effectiveness for UAV/drone forensic investigations. Next, we present our set of guidelines for UAV/drone investigations. Finally, we demonstrate how the proposed guidelines can be used to guide a drone forensic investigation using the DJI Phantom 3 drone as a case study.
翻译:无人驾驶航空器(又称无人驾驶航空器(无人驾驶航空器(无人驾驶航空器)))是数字调查中证据的一个潜在来源,部分原因是它们在我国社会越来越受欢迎,然而,现有的无人驾驶航空器/地产法医一般依赖传统的数字法医调查准则,如ACPO和NIST的这类准则,这些准则可能不完全适合目的。在本文件中,我们确定了与无人驾驶航空器/地产法医有关的挑战。然后,我们探讨和评估现有的法医准则,从它们对于无人驾驶航空器/地产法医调查的有效性的角度来考虑。接下来,我们提出一套无人驾驶航空器/地产调查准则。最后,我们展示了如何利用拟议准则指导无人驾驶法医调查,将DJI Phantom 3无人驾驶飞机作为案例研究。
Phantom X (大雾 Phantom 4 Pro +
Phantom 4 Pro
Phantom 4
Phantom 3 Professional
Phantom 3 Advanced
Phantom 3 4K
Phantom 3 Standard
Phantom 2 Vision+
Phantom 2 Vision
Phantom 2
Phantom FC40
Phantom