We consider problems of the following type: given a graph $G$, how many edges are needed in the worst case for a sparse subgraph $H$ that approximately preserves distances between a given set of node pairs $P$? Examples include pairwise spanners, distance preservers, reachability preservers, etc. There has been a trend in the area of simple constructions based on the hitting set technique, followed by somewhat more complicated constructions that improve over the bounds obtained from hitting sets by roughly a $\log$ factor. In this note, we point out that the simpler constructions based on hitting sets don't actually need an extra $\log$ factor in the first place. This simplifies and unifies a few proofs in the area, and it improves the size of the $+4$ pairwise spanner from $\widetilde{O}(np^{2/7})$ [Kavitha Th. Comp. Sys. '17] to $O(np^{2/7})$.
翻译:我们考虑的是以下类型的问题:给一个图表$G$,在最差的情况下,稀薄的子节点$H$需要多少边缘,大约能保持特定一组节点对方之间的距离?举例来说,包括配对的打手、距离保护者、可达性保护者等。在以打击组合技术为基础的简单建筑领域,出现了一种趋势,随后是比较复杂的建筑,这些建筑比打一组打球获得的界限增加了大约1美元。在本说明中,我们指出,以打球组合为基础的较简单的建筑实际上不需要在第一个地方增加1美元系数。这简化和统一了该地区的一些证据,提高了美元+4美元的双向打字员的规模,从美元到美元(np%2/7}[Kavitha Th. comp. '17] 到美元(np%2/7}。