Deep generative models have demonstrated the ability to generate complex, high-dimensional, and photo-realistic data. However, a unified framework for evaluating different generative modeling families remains a challenge. Indeed, likelihood-based metrics do not apply in many cases while pure sample-based metrics such as FID fail to capture known failure modes such as overfitting on training data. In this work, we introduce the Feature Likelihood Score (FLS), a parametric sample-based score that uses density estimation to quantitatively measure the quality/diversity of generated samples while taking into account overfitting. We empirically demonstrate the ability of FLS to identify specific overfitting problem cases, even when previously proposed metrics fail. We further perform an extensive experimental evaluation on various image datasets and model classes. Our results indicate that FLS matches intuitions of previous metrics, such as FID, while providing a more holistic evaluation of generative models that highlights models whose generalization abilities are under or overappreciated. Code for computing FLS is provided at https://github.com/marcojira/fls
翻译:深度基因化模型已经证明能够生成复杂、高维和光学现实数据,然而,评价不同基因模型家庭的统一框架仍是一项挑战。事实上,基于概率的衡量标准在许多情况中并不适用,而纯基于样本的衡量标准,如FID,未能捕捉已知的失败模式,如过度匹配培训数据等。在这项工作中,我们引入了地貌相似评分(FLS),这是一种基于样本的参数性评分,使用密度估测来量化测量所生成样品的质量/多样性,同时考虑过份。我们实证地展示了FLS确定特定问题案例的能力,即使先前提议的衡量标准不合格。我们进一步对各种图像数据集和模型类别进行了广泛的实验性评估。我们的结果显示,FLS与FID等以往指标的直观相匹配,同时提供了更全面评价模型的基因化模型,以突出其一般能力低于或过称的模型。我们在https://github.com/marcojira/flis提供了计算FLS的代码。