Causal inference is capable of estimating the treatment effect (i.e., the causal effect of treatment on the outcome) to benefit the decision making in various domains. One fundamental challenge in this research is that the treatment assignment bias in observational data. To increase the validity of observational studies on causal inference, representation based methods as the state-of-the-art have demonstrated the superior performance of treatment effect estimation. Most representation based methods assume all observed covariates are pre-treatment (i.e., not affected by the treatment), and learn a balanced representation from these observed covariates for estimating treatment effect. Unfortunately, this assumption is often too strict a requirement in practice, as some covariates are changed by doing an intervention on treatment (i.e., post-treatment). By contrast, the balanced representation learned from unchanged covariates thus biases the treatment effect estimation.
翻译:266. 为使观察数据的治疗分配偏差成为本研究的基本挑战之一。为了提高因果推断观察研究的有效性,以代表性为基础的方法(如最新技术)证明了治疗效果估计的优劣性。多数基于代表性的方法假定所有观察到的共同变量都是预处理(即不受治疗影响 ), 并从这些观察到的共同变量中吸取均衡的代表性来估计治疗效果。不幸的是,这一假设在实践中往往过于严格,因为一些共同变量通过对治疗(即后处理)的干预而改变。相比之下,从不变的共变中得出的均衡代表性则对治疗效果估计产生偏差。