While many studies have looked at privacy properties of the Android and Google Play app ecosystem, comparatively much less is known about iOS and the Apple App Store, the most widely used ecosystem in the US. At the same time, there is increasing competition around privacy between these smartphone operating system providers. In this paper, we present a study of 24k Android and iOS apps from 2020 along several dimensions relating to user privacy. We find that third-party tracking and the sharing of unique user identifiers was widespread in apps from both ecosystems, even in apps aimed at children. In the children's category, iOS apps used much fewer advertising-related tracking than their Android counterparts, but could more often access children's location (by a factor of 7). Across all studied apps, our study highlights widespread potential violations of US, EU and UK privacy law, including 1) the use of third-party tracking without user consent, 2) the lack of parental consent before sharing PII with third-parties in children's apps, 3) the non-data-minimising configuration of tracking libraries, 4) the sending of personal data to countries without an adequate level of data protection, and 5) the continued absence of transparency around tracking, partly due to design decisions by Apple and Google. Overall, we find that neither platform is clearly better than the other for privacy across the dimensions we studied.
翻译:虽然许多研究都考察了Android 和 Google Play Play 应用生态系统的隐私性质,但相对而言,对iOS 和App App Store这两个美国使用最为广泛的生态系统的已知程度要低得多。与此同时,这些智能操作系统供应商之间在隐私问题上的竞争日益加剧。在本论文中,我们介绍了对2020年以来24k Android 和iOS 应用的24k Android 和 iOS 与用户隐私有关的几个层面的研究。我们发现,在两个生态系统的应用中,第三方跟踪和共享独特的用户识别器十分普遍,即使在针对儿童的应用程序中也是如此。在儿童类别中,iOS 应用程序使用与广告有关的跟踪比Android对应的系统要少得多,但更经常地使用儿童所在地(7倍 ) 。 在所研究的所有应用中,我们的研究中都强调了美国、欧盟和联合王国隐私法的普遍潜在违法行为,包括:(1) 未经用户同意使用第三方跟踪;(2) 在儿童应用程序中与第三方共享PII之前缺乏父母同意;(3) 跟踪图书馆的非数据配置。 在儿童应用程序中,4 向各国发送个人数据时,在没有足够隐私的情况下,我们没有进行适当的数据跟踪。