Berger et al., published in TOPLAS 2019, is a critique of our 2014 FSE conference abstract and its archival version, the 2017 CACM paper: A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in Github. In their paper Berger et al. make academic claims about the veracity of our work. Here, we respond to their technical and scientific critiques aimed at our work, attempting to stick with scientific discourse. We find that Berger et al. largely replicated our results, and agree with us in their conclusion: that the effects (in a statistical sense) found in the data are small, and should be taken with caution, and that it is possible that an absence of effect is the correct interpretation. Thus, our CACM paper's conclusions still hold, even more so now that they have been reproduced, and our paper is eminently citable.
翻译:2019年在TOPLAS TOPLAS 2019上发表的Berger等人对我们2014年FSE会议摘要及其档案版(2017年CAMM论文:Github的方案编制语言和守则质量的大规模研究)的批评,在他们的论文中,Berger等人对我们工作的真实性提出了学术主张。在这里,我们回应了他们针对我们工作的技术和科学评论,试图坚持科学论述。我们发现Berger等人在很大程度上复制了我们的成果,并同意我们的结论:数据中发现的影响(从统计意义上说)很小,应当谨慎对待,而且缺乏效果有可能是正确解释。因此,我们CAM论文的结论仍然维持着,现在更是这样,我们的文件已被复制了,而且我们的文件是引人瞩目的。