Scientific machine learning (SciML) is a field of increasing interest in several different application fields. In an optimization context, SciML-based tools have enabled the development of more efficient optimization methods. However, implementing SciML tools for optimization must be rigorously evaluated and performed with caution. This work proposes the deductions of a robustness test that guarantees the robustness of multiobjective SciML-based optimization by showing that its results respect the universal approximator theorem. The test is applied in the framework of a novel methodology which is evaluated in a series of benchmarks illustrating its consistency. Moreover, the proposed methodology results are compared with feasible regions of rigorous optimization, which requires a significantly higher computational effort. Hence, this work provides a robustness test for guaranteed robustness in applying SciML tools in multiobjective optimization with lower computational effort than the existent alternative.
翻译:科学机器学习(SciML)是一个对若干不同应用领域越来越感兴趣的领域。在优化方面,基于SciML的工具有助于开发更有效率的优化方法。然而,必须严格评估和谨慎地实施SciML优化工具。这项工作提议扣减稳健性测试,以显示其结果尊重通用近似光化理论,从而保证多目标的SciML优化的稳健性。该测试在新方法的框架内应用,该方法在一系列基准中加以评价,说明其一致性。此外,拟议方法结果与可行的严格优化区域进行了比较,这需要大大提高计算努力。因此,这项工作提供了一个稳健性测试,以保证在多目标优化中使用SciML工具时稳健性,而计算努力比现有替代方法低。