Chamfer Distance (CD) and Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) are two broadly adopted metrics for measuring the similarity between two point sets. However, CD is usually insensitive to mismatched local density, and EMD is usually dominated by global distribution while overlooks the fidelity of detailed structures. Besides, their unbounded value range induces a heavy influence from the outliers. These defects prevent them from providing a consistent evaluation. To tackle these problems, we propose a new similarity measure named Density-aware Chamfer Distance (DCD). It is derived from CD and benefits from several desirable properties: 1) it can detect disparity of density distributions and is thus a more intensive measure of similarity compared to CD; 2) it is stricter with detailed structures and significantly more computationally efficient than EMD; 3) the bounded value range encourages a more stable and reasonable evaluation over the whole test set. We adopt DCD to evaluate the point cloud completion task, where experimental results show that DCD pays attention to both the overall structure and local geometric details and provides a more reliable evaluation even when CD and EMD contradict each other. We can also use DCD as the training loss, which outperforms the same model trained with CD loss on all three metrics. In addition, we propose a novel point discriminator module that estimates the priority for another guided down-sampling step, and it achieves noticeable improvements under DCD together with competitive results for both CD and EMD. We hope our work could pave the way for a more comprehensive and practical point cloud similarity evaluation. Our code will be available at: https://github.com/wutong16/Density_aware_Chamfer_Distance .
翻译:CD和地球移动器距离(EMD)是衡量两组点相近性的两个广泛采用的新相似度指标。然而,CD通常对不匹配的地方密度不敏感,而EMD通常以全球分布为主,而忽略了详细结构的忠实性。此外,它们的无限制值范围吸引了外界的强烈影响。这些缺陷使它们无法提供一致的评估。为了解决这些问题,我们建议了一个新的类似度度测量标准,名为Density-aware Chamfer距离(DCD)。它来自CD,并且从一些理想的特性中获益:(1)它能够检测密度分布的差异,因此是比CD更紧密的相似度衡量标准;(2)它使用详细结构更为严格,而且比EMD更具有计算效率;(3) 它们的无限制值范围鼓励对整个测试场进行更稳定和合理的评估。我们采用DCD来评估点完成任务,实验结果显示DCD能够关注整个结构和本地的地理测量细节,并且提供更可靠的评估,即使CDDD-D模型相互抵触,我们也可以使用一个更清晰的CD模型来计算损失。